Creative Interdisciplinarity in Art & Design Research
Loughborough University 1st, 2nd of July2009 The Sir Frank Gibb Building - Civil Engineering
 
 

Keynote Speakers

Simon Biggs
Research Professor, Edinburgh College of Art

   This keynote will present three examples of creative interdisciplinary research the artist has been involved in. The projects discussed cover a period of 25 years, demonstrating how the character of such interdisciplinary practice and research has evolved. The presentation will be supported by software, digital video and still image documentation.
    A key insight drawn from these three distinct but connected examples of interdisciplinary research notes how work across disciplines and between specialists can lead to unexpected outcomes and how these can iteratively inform the development of the researcher’s and practitioner’s work in their respective disciplines.


Nathan Crilly
University of Cambridge

   This talk will promote the use of scholarly approaches to design research, especially the practice of reading across disciplinary boundaries. Three different research projects will be reviewed in which ideas were drawn from a broad range of academic fields, including communication theory, diagram theory, philosophy of art, philosophy of science, linguistics, law, sociology and psychology. Against the background of these three projects, issues relating to the practice of design research will be discussed. In particular, we will address the need for interdisciplinarity, the challenges it brings and the benefits it offers. The talk will conclude by suggesting that reading across disciplinary boundaries is necessary to many aspects of design research, and that despite the difficulties involved, it can yield a better informed perspective on design.
 


Martyn Dade-Robertson

   Whilst the virtues of interdisciplinary research are well known and the function of Design as a bridging discipline is well discussed, there is a tendency of people within the design discipline to engage in the rhetoric of pattern matching. My own experience in the field of ‘information architecture’ has lead to a number of conclusions about the dangers of pattern matching and as a result in my own research I have sought to develop methods which find the roots of terminology and disciplinary specialisation in order to find deep and hidden relationships between disciplines. This paper will detail some of this research with reference to information visualisation, the design of graphical user interfaces, the pre-history of architecture and the relationship of buildings to categorisation systems.